Thanks for all the support people....Much appreciated.
I would like to state for the record that this particular man was aware of the issues involved as you will hear in a certain section of the judicial coming up. He gives an almost flawless picture of what I believed at the time some of which was based on what was said on this podcast. He knew where the battle lines were alright.
Regarding mentioning Jesus and 607 , he you will recall was the one who turned the conversation on to doctrinal matters. He obviously felt that would take the heat off him and into more "comfortable territory". That was why I responded with that material. It shook him up big time.....he says so at the judicial.
I was there to confront him on the lies and slurs on our character and our children. He obviously was uncomfortable and "caught on the hop", what a shame.....it didn't stop him getting me out of bed one Saturday morning by sending two of his cronies to tell me that in four days I was being put on trial for apostasy and he was one of the chief witnesses at the trial.
It did take a lot out of me to go down on Dec 25, in a pair of denims and a beanie hat, to the kingdom hall and confront the top dog for his atrocious behaviour. But it needed to be done. If he comes out of it looking bad then I'm sorry for him. But no matter how much you polish a turd it will always be a turd.( I'm not saying he's a turd btw)He represents a hateful , corrupt and immoral religious entity which he in fact worships. How can you look good when you represent that?
It's like when you see a top barrister representing a guy who's blatantly guilty of some heinous crime. How do you feel? Do you think he's just doing his job?
He knows the guy did it , the guy knows he did it, we all know he did it but the trial goes on, through the motions.
That's the feeling I have about my exchanges with this guy. You kind of lose any regard for him when you actually know what he's trying to defend.
Hobo.